🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". A law may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," said one MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the local government level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, additional countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that states globally are less and less content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.